Perú:
Chilean company, Santa Isabel discriminates
its consumers for their sexual orientation
Lima, Raíz Diversidad Sexual.- A couple of young gay activists were discriminated against last August 09 th at the restaurant Dulces y Salados, located at the second floor of the a supermarket owned by Chilean stockholders, Santa Isabel, just because they kissed while they were having a coffee in the premises.
Ivan, Carlos Omar's partner, and also a victim of this incident stated that they “were sitting almost in a corner of the restaurant, for about a half an hour, when one of the waiters asked us to stop our affectionate gestures (kissing and hugging), he inferred that they had received complaints from other customers that felt uncomfortable and offended by our actions”.
The case, which was reported by the victims to the “Comisión de Protección al Consumidor de INDECOP”, (Consuner protection agency) was reported in different TV programs and newspapers with national circulation. During their apologetic statements, the spokesperson for Santa Isabel Supermarkets commented that they gay couple was close to the areas were children were sitting.
The set
15 days after the incident, several KGBT groups, gathered by the “ Mesa pot la No Discriminacion”, met at the Supermarket Santa Isabel, located in the San Miguel district, with the slogan “Why isn't our affection affective?”, “No to discrimination”.
The protesters where carrying a banner that read, “ Santa Isabel discriminates against Gays, Lesbians, Trans and Bisexuals”.
Representatives from the different groups spoke during the protest that lasted more than an hour and multicolor flags were handed out to clients at the supermarket. Afterwards, Carlos and Ivan kissed in front of the door of the store that they were kicked out. Following that, Christian Oliviera, a Mhol representative, read a press release by “ Mesa pot la No Discriminacion” and LGBT groups. Finally, a small march took place in front of the establishment. This event was covered by the media and organizers stated that they would repeat it if new incidents of discrimination took place. / Back to top |